Imports, Deficits, and the Exorbitant Privilege
Part II of “The Dollar Empire: How America’s Currency Shapes Global Trade—and Itself”
“Only one country in the world can buy what it wants with its own I.O.U.s; and it’s not because we’re smarter. It’s because the rest of the world still wants the paper.”
Introduction: A Deficit by Design
To some politicians and pundits, a trade deficit is a red flag; proof that a country is importing too much, exporting too little, and losing the long game of globalization. Year after year, the U.S. runs massive trade deficits with countries like China, Mexico, Germany, and Vietnam. The political narrative practically writes itself: We buy their goods, they take our jobs.
But the truth is more complicated; especially when you're the country that issues the currency the entire global economy runs on.
In this installment, we explore why the U.S. trade deficit isn’t necessarily a bug of American policy, but a feature of the dollar system itself. We’ll explain why persistent trade deficits are the natural side effect of reserve currency status, why most other countries can’t do the same, and how this dynamic reshapes the U.S. economy; from industrial hollowing to rising asset prices and consumer dependency.
The Global Dollar Recycling Machine
Here’s the basic structure:
The world needs dollars to conduct trade, service debts, and hold reserves.
The U.S. supplies those dollars by importing more than it exports.
The dollars spent on foreign goods are recycled back into the U.S. via purchases of U.S. assets; especially Treasury bonds.
This system creates a closed loop of dollar demand and supply. It looks like this:
U.S. imports goods → sends dollars abroad → foreign central banks buy U.S. debt → U.S. uses debt to fund more imports.
This is not a policy flaw. It’s the plumbing of global finance.
If the U.S. stopped running a trade deficit tomorrow, the world would experience a dollar shortage, triggering rising borrowing costs in emerging markets, deflationary pressure on global trade, and possibly a scramble for alternative currency systems. In other words: our “unsustainable” deficits are exactly what sustains the current system.
Why the U.S. Can Get Away With It; And Others Can’t
Most countries don’t have the option to run persistent trade deficits without painful consequences. If they import more than they export, they eventually run out of foreign reserves, suffer currency depreciation, and are forced into austerity or borrowing under strict conditions (see: IMF programs, Latin America in the 1980s, Greece in the 2010s).
But the U.S. pays for its imports in its own currency; a currency that the rest of the world actively wants.
That’s what French Finance Minister Valéry Giscard d’Estaing famously called the “exorbitant privilege.” No other country can issue global reserve currency at scale. As long as the world wants dollars, the U.S. doesn’t have to “earn” them.
And because other countries are net exporters seeking to accumulate dollar reserves, the U.S. becomes the natural consumer of last resort. It imports the world’s output, issues dollar liabilities in return, and becomes the sinkhole for excess global supply.
What the Trade Deficit Actually Measures
When we talk about the U.S. trade deficit, what we’re really measuring is the difference between what we consume and borrow, versus what we produce and sell. The trade deficit reflects:
A strong consumer economy with a high standard of living
A hollowed-out manufacturing base that relies on imports for low-cost goods
An investment magnet economy that absorbs foreign capital
It is not, contrary to political rhetoric, a simple matter of losing to China or failing to compete. In fact, much of the trade deficit with China reflects multinational supply chains, where U.S. firms outsource parts of production to lower-cost regions before importing finished goods.
The deficit is structural. It is baked into the dollar’s role.
The Costs of the Privilege
None of this means the trade deficit is painless or benign. There are real and significant costs:
1. Industrial Erosion
Because the U.S. must import to supply the world with dollars, it sacrifices domestic manufacturing to some degree. The result: offshored factories, shuttered plants, and working-class wage stagnation in industrial regions.
2. Unequal Gains
While cheaper imports raise living standards broadly, the benefits are unevenly distributed. Investors and asset holders benefit from low inflation and strong capital inflows, while displaced workers face job losses and retraining struggles.
3. Dependency on Global Capital
To sustain the loop, the U.S. must remain an attractive destination for global capital. Political dysfunction, debt ceiling standoffs, or erratic policy can spook investors and threaten that capital inflow. The more the U.S. leans on foreign capital, the more fragile the arrangement becomes.
Why It Hasn’t Collapsed (Yet)
Despite persistent deficits and mounting debt, the system holds because:
There’s no scalable alternative to the dollar. The euro is fragmented. The yuan is capital controlled. Gold is illiquid. Crypto is too volatile.
Foreign nations rely on exports. China, Germany, and much of Southeast Asia depend on the U.S. consumer to absorb their goods.
Dollar assets are still the safest bet. In times of crisis, from the 2008 crash to COVID to banking instability in 2023, the world always rushes back to the dollar.
The system works; until it doesn’t. And if it ever fails, it won’t be because the U.S. imported too many TVs. It’ll be because the underlying trust in dollar dominance eroded through overreach, economic instability, or political misuse.
Conclusion: A Trade Deficit Is a Global Service
The U.S. isn’t just running a trade deficit for itself. It’s doing so on behalf of the world economy; serving as the buyer of last resort and the fountain of global liquidity. In that light, the trade deficit is more than a budget line item. It’s a form of global stewardship, however imperfect.
But this stewardship comes with serious domestic consequences: inequality, industrial atrophy, and the political backlash that always follows perceived decline. As we’ll explore in the next installment, this backlash increasingly manifests as inflation fears and monetary tightening; setting the stage for a fragile feedback loop between the dollar, the Fed, and the rest of the world.
The U.S. can keep buying the world’s goods, but the world might not keep buying the illusion that it comes without cost.
☞ Enjoyed this piece? Help keep the work going.
This Substack is part of a broader project to reimagine public policy for real people—grounded in Modern Monetary Theory, committed to abundance over austerity, and focused on rebuilding the freedom infrastructure of everyday life.
If my work resonates with you:
Share it. The new needs friends.
Subscribe on YouTube for more multi-format content.
Consider a paid subscription to support this work directly. I’m a regular person with a mortgage, a day job, and three kids—building out these ideas takes time, energy, and yes, money.
Together, we can reclaim what was once built—and build it back better.